On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 6:07 PM, Jeremy Stanley <fu...@yuggoth.org> wrote:
> The current solution of not publishing installation guides for EOL > releases seems like a > good enough compromise there to me. > This then breaks fidelity for those operators who need to either reinstall their existing environment, which may be based on an eol or LTS supported version of OpenStack, or for those who need to fully document their existing, running install. I am very opposed to removing subsets of docs, including the install guide, after the release goes eol upstream from consumers for exactly that reason. Watermarking the upstream docs with series and version should reduce or eliminate the need for people to incorrectly submit fixes, patches and PRs for eol releases that the core team can no longer support, but that shouldn't necessitate removal of the installation instructions.
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
