On 22 January 2014 12:05, Liz Blanchard <lsure...@redhat.com> wrote: >
> How about Instance Type? I’m looking at page 10 of the latest wireframes [1] > and I see we are using the terms “Resource”, “Node”, and “Instance” to labels > certain items. I’m pretty sure Node and Instance are different, but I’m > wondering if we need to introduce Resource as a new term. It's not a new term, its generic in Heat, but it's also arguably incorrect here because as Jay says, this isn't the resource itself, its a description of what will go in the template definition to request that heat deploy instances. Instance Type would be horribly confusing IMNSHO - too close to http://aws.amazon.com/ec2/instance-types/ - which it is not at all like. -Rob -- Robert Collins <rbtcoll...@hp.com> Distinguished Technologist HP Converged Cloud _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
