I thought we were avoiding using overcloud and undercloud within the UI? -J
On 01/28/2014 03:04 AM, Tzu-Mainn Chen wrote: > I've spent some time thinking about this, and I have a clarification. > > I don't like the use of the word 'deployment', because it's not exact > enough for me. Future plans for the tuskar-ui include management of the > undercloud as well, and at that point, 'deployment role' becomes vague, as > it could also logically apply to the undercloud. > > For that reason, I think we should call it an 'overcloud deployment role', > or 'overcloud role' for short. > > That being said, I think that the UI could get away with just displaying > 'Role', as presumably the user would be in a page with enough context to > make it clear that he's in the overcloud section. > > > Mainn > > ----- Original Message ----- >> I'd argue that we should call it 'overcloud role' - at least from the >> modeling >> point of view - since the tuskar-api calls a deployment an overcloud. >> >> But I like the general direction of the term-renaming! >> >> Mainn >> -- Jason E. Rist Senior Software Engineer OpenStack Management UI Red Hat, Inc. +1.919.754.4048 Freenode: jrist github/identi.ca: knowncitizen _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev