On 23/01/14 10:46, Robert Collins wrote:
> On 22 January 2014 12:05, Liz Blanchard <lsure...@redhat.com> wrote:
>> How about Instance Type? I’m looking at page 10 of the latest wireframes [1] 
>> and I see we are using the terms “Resource”, “Node”, and “Instance” to 
>> labels certain items. I’m pretty sure Node and Instance are different, but 
>> I’m wondering if we need to introduce Resource as a new term.
> It's not a new term, its generic in Heat, but it's also arguably
> incorrect here because as Jay says, this isn't the resource itself,
> its a description of what will go in the template definition to
> request that heat deploy instances.
> Instance Type would be horribly confusing IMNSHO - too close to
> http://aws.amazon.com/ec2/instance-types/ - which it is not at all
> like.

Instance Role then?

We could also have Instance Category, Instance Kind, Instance Purpose,
Instance Assignment, Instance Genre, Instance Class...

Radomir Dopieralski

OpenStack-dev mailing list

Reply via email to