On 23/01/14 10:46, Robert Collins wrote: > On 22 January 2014 12:05, Liz Blanchard <lsure...@redhat.com> wrote: >> > > >> How about Instance Type? I’m looking at page 10 of the latest wireframes [1] >> and I see we are using the terms “Resource”, “Node”, and “Instance” to >> labels certain items. I’m pretty sure Node and Instance are different, but >> I’m wondering if we need to introduce Resource as a new term. > > It's not a new term, its generic in Heat, but it's also arguably > incorrect here because as Jay says, this isn't the resource itself, > its a description of what will go in the template definition to > request that heat deploy instances. > > Instance Type would be horribly confusing IMNSHO - too close to > http://aws.amazon.com/ec2/instance-types/ - which it is not at all > like.
Instance Role then? We could also have Instance Category, Instance Kind, Instance Purpose, Instance Assignment, Instance Genre, Instance Class... -- Radomir Dopieralski _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
