On Aug 6, 2014 10:21 AM, "Ronak Shah" <ronak.malav.s...@gmail.com> wrote: > > We have diverged our attention towards nova-network-> neutron parity on this thread unnecessarily. > > Can we discuss and collectively decide on what is the way forward for GBP in Juno release? > > Efforts have been made by the subteam starting from throwing PoC at last summit to spec approval to code review. > > There are usefulness to this feature and I think everyone is on the same page there. > > Let us not discourage the effort by bringing in existing neutron issue in play.
> Yes, we has a neutorn community needs to fix that with highest priority. > But this is orthogonal effort. The efforts may be orthogonal, but the review team and bandwidth of said team is one and the same. Making nova-network the highest priority means pushing other blueprints back as needed. And since there is still so much uncertainty around GPB this late in the cycle, IMHO it's a good candidate for getting deferred. > If endpoint is not a likeable preferred name than lets propose more meaningful alternative. > Let us try to find a middle ground on how this feature can be made generally available. > > Thanks, > Ronak > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStackemail@example.com > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStackfirstname.lastname@example.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev