On Aug 6, 2014 10:21 AM, "Ronak Shah" <ronak.malav.s...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> We have diverged our attention towards nova-network-> neutron parity on
this thread unnecessarily.
>
> Can we discuss and collectively decide on what is the way forward for GBP
in Juno release?
>
> Efforts have been made by the subteam starting from throwing PoC at last
summit to spec approval to code review.
>
> There are usefulness to this feature and I think everyone is on the same
page there.
>
> Let us not discourage the effort by bringing in existing neutron issue in
play.

> Yes, we has a neutorn community needs to fix that with highest priority.
> But this is orthogonal effort.

The efforts may be orthogonal, but the review team and bandwidth of said
team is one and the same. Making nova-network the highest priority means
pushing other blueprints back as needed.  And since there is still so much
uncertainty around GPB this late in the cycle, IMHO it's a good candidate
for getting deferred.

> If endpoint is not a likeable preferred name than lets propose more
meaningful alternative.
> Let us try to find a middle ground on how this feature can be made
generally available.
>
> Thanks,
> Ronak
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to