On 08/28/2014 04:01 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 2:43 PM, Alan Kavanagh <alan.kavan...@ericsson.com <mailto:alan.kavan...@ericsson.com>> wrote: I share Donald's points here, I believe what would help is to clearly describe in the Wiki the process and workflow for the BP approval process and build in this process how to deal with discrepancies/disagreements and build timeframes for each stage and process of appeal etc. The current process would benefit from some fine tuning and helping to build safe guards and time limits/deadlines so folks can expect responses within a reasonable time and not be left waiting in the cold. This is a resource problem, the nova team simply does not have enough people doing enough reviews to make this possible.
All the more reason to make it obvious which reviews are not being addressed in a timely fashion. (I'm thinking something akin to the order screen at a fast food restaurant that starts blinking in red and beeping if an order hasn't been filled in a certain amount of time.)
Perhaps by making it clear that reviews are a bottleneck this will actually help to address the problem.
Chris _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStackemail@example.com http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev