Hi Ajay,

We are testing the same scenario that you are working one, but getting the
follow error:

http://paste.openstack.org/show/105029/

Could you be of any help here?

Thanks




On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 4:16 AM, Ajay Kalambur (akalambu) <akala...@cisco.com
> wrote:

>  Hi Guys
> For the throughput tests I need to be able to install iperf on the cloud
> image. For this DNS server needs to be set. But the current network context
> should also support DNS name server setting
> Should we add that into network context?
> Ajay
>
>
>
>   From: Boris Pavlovic <bo...@pavlovic.me>
>
> Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <
> openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
> Date: Friday, August 29, 2014 at 2:08 PM
>
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <
> openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
> Cc: "Harshil Shah (harsshah)" <harss...@cisco.com>
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Rally scenario Issue
>
>   Timur,
>
>  Thanks for pointing Ajay.
>
>  Ajay,
>
>   Also I cannot see this failure unless I run rally with –v –d object.
>
>
>  Actually rally is sotring information about all failures. To get
> information about them you can run next command:
>
>  *rally task results --pprint*
>
>  It will display all information about all iterations (including
> exceptions)
>
>
>   Second when most of the steps in the scenario failed like attaching to
>> network, ssh and run command why bother reporting the results
>
>
>  Because, bad results are better then nothing...
>
>
>  Best regards,
> Boris Pavlovic
>
>
> On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 12:54 AM, Timur Nurlygayanov <
> tnurlygaya...@mirantis.com> wrote:
>
>>   Hi Ajay,
>>
>>  looks like you need to use NeutronContext feature to configure Neutron
>> Networks during the benchmarks execution.
>>  We now working on merge of two different comits with NeutronContext
>> implementation:
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/96300  and
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/103306
>>
>>  could you please apply commit https://review.openstack.org/#/c/96300
>> and run your benchmarks? Neutron Network with subnetworks and routers will
>> be automatically created for each created tenant and you should have the
>> ability to connect to VMs. Please, note, that you should add the following
>> part to your task JSON to enable Neutron context:
>> ...
>> "context": {
>>     ...
>>     "neutron_network": {
>>         "network_cidr": "10.%s.0.0/16",
>>     }
>> }
>> ...
>>
>>  Hope this will help.
>>
>>
>>
>>  On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 11:42 PM, Ajay Kalambur (akalambu) <
>> akala...@cisco.com> wrote:
>>
>>>   Hi
>>> I am trying to run the Rally scenario boot-runcommand-delete. This
>>> scenario has the following code
>>>   def boot_runcommand_delete(self, image, flavor,
>>>                                script, interpreter, username,
>>>                                fixed_network="private",
>>>                                floating_network="public",
>>>                                ip_version=4, port=22,
>>>                                use_floatingip=True, **kwargs):
>>>    server = None
>>>         floating_ip = None
>>>         try:
>>>             print "fixed network:%s floating network:%s"
>>> %(fixed_network,floating_network)
>>>             server = self._boot_server(
>>>                 self._generate_random_name("rally_novaserver_"),
>>>                 image, flavor, key_name='rally_ssh_key', **kwargs)
>>>
>>>  *            self.check_network(server, fixed_network)*
>>>
>>>  The question I have is the instance is created with a call to
>>> boot_server but no networks are attached to this server instance. Next step
>>> it goes and checks if the fixed network is attached to the instance and
>>> sure enough it fails
>>> At the step highlighted in bold. Also I cannot see this failure unless I
>>> run rally with –v –d object. So it actually reports benchmark scenario
>>> numbers in a table with no errors when I run with
>>> rally task start boot-and-delete.json
>>>
>>>  And reports results. First what am I missing in this case. Thing is I
>>> am using neutron not nova-network
>>> Second when most of the steps in the scenario failed like attaching to
>>> network, ssh and run command why bother reporting the results
>>>
>>>  Ajay
>>>
>>>
>>>  _______________________________________________
>>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>>> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>>  Timur,
>> QA Engineer
>> OpenStack Projects
>> Mirantis Inc
>>
>> [image: http://www.openstacksv.com/] <http://www.openstacksv.com/>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to