On 11 September 2014 15:35, James Bottomley <james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com> wrote:
> OK, so look at a concrete example: in 2002, the Linux kernel went with > bitkeeper precisely because we'd reached the scaling limit of a single > integration point, so we took the kernel from a single contributing team > to a bunch of them. This was expanded with git in 2005 and leads to the > hundreds of contributing teams we have today. One thing the kernel has that Openstack doesn't, that alter the way this model plays out, is a couple of very strong, forthright and frank personalities at the top who are pretty well respected. Both Andrew and Linux (and others) regularly if not frequently rip into ideas quite scathingly, even after they have passed other barriers and gauntlets and just say no to things. Openstack has nothing of this sort, and there is no evidence that e.g. the TC can, should or desire to fill this role. _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev