On 9/11/14, 2:55 PM, "Thierry Carrez" <thie...@openstack.org> wrote:
>Sean Dague wrote: >> [...] >> Why don't we start with "let's clean up the virt interface and make it >> more sane", as I don't think there is any disagreement there. If it's >> going to take a cycle, it's going to take a cycle anyway (it will >> probably take 2 cycles, realistically, we always underestimate these >> things, remember when no-db-compute was going to be 1 cycle?). I don't >> see the need to actually decide here and now that the split is clearly >> at least 7 - 12 months away. A lot happens in the intervening time. > >Yes, that sounds like the logical next step. We can't split drivers >without first doing that anyway. I still think "people need smaller >areas of work", as Vish eloquently put it. I still hope that refactoring >our test architecture will let us reach the same level of quality with >only a fraction of the tests being run at the gate, which should address >most of the harm you see in adding additional repositories. But I agree >there is little point in discussing splitting virt drivers (or anything >else, really) until the internal interface below that potential split is >fully cleaned up and it becomes an option. How about we start to try and patch gerrit to provide +2 permissions for people Who can be assigned Œdriver core¹ status. This is something that is relevant to Nova and Neutron and I guess Cinder too. Thanks Gary > >-- >Thierry Carrez (ttx) > >_______________________________________________ >OpenStack-dev mailing list >OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org >http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev