On 2 October 2014 14:30, joehuang <joehu...@huawei.com> wrote: > In our PoC design principle, the cascaded OpenStack should work passively, > and has no kowledge "whether it is running under cascading senario or not to" > and "whether there is sibling OpenStack or not", to reduce interconnect > between cascaded OpenStacks as much as possible. > And one level cascading is enough for foreseeable future.
The transparency is what worries me, e.g. at the moment I can attach any volume to any vm (* depending on cinder AZ policy), which is going to be broken in a cascaded scenario if the volume and vm are in different leaves. > PoC team planned to stay at Paris from Oct.29 to Nov.8, are you interested in > a f2f workshop for deep diving in the OpenStack cascading? Definitely interested, yes please. _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStackemail@example.com http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev