-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 10/14/2014 10:22 AM, Everett Toews wrote: >> I personally think proposing patches to an openstack-api repository is the >> most effective way to make those proposals. Etherpads and wiki pages are >> fine for dumping content, but IMO, we don't need to dump content -- we >> already have plenty of it. We need to propose guidelines for *new* APIs to >> follow. > +1 > > I’m all for putting a stake in the ground (in the form of docs in a repo) and > having people debate that. I think it results in a much more focused > discussion as opposed to dumping content into an etherpad/wiki page and > trying to wade through it. If people want to dump content somewhere and use > that to help inform their contributions to the repo, that’s okay too.
+1 from me too. Etherpads for active discussions tend to devolve into a mess. - -- Ed Leafe -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJUPVQpAAoJEKMgtcocwZqL95cP/j6yt8UKflP91KRZsiXMTU/h TBb8CY3dGnwsvYJcbU5gtfvp52QAc2tnI4H8hwUGmnuaTmz0Bm3EE5gMmmB3VNw3 5a1wdoJANVQ86vRwKq8r7U5cgUIRmPDTl7OGZnS3x3H7fJR0bZa/QcFYNNU3rAqO 0HcpljDTLXU9PLKcGQ6ueeQLfZDQJGB96TZxcf+w5WUbUnLD4pMjHWnn2HR55v44 pAqHkD+swNCq061OffriG+w87+In15433QPbtNKmNQhXODCTwRI77WkVlF02p6Ca X+pi6YGMI4lshmyS4vn/7DZryrVQYxtS0lCOMHIhK0+GLdZ9TjzNAWACnSCPLuKK OYM2KEoGWJS8dHSx5WuiNcCnhZ7W+d+TM1/tgKtdGkBMmKNMSOkD5vuAywzSEJZW tUAq87SHxgINlkra9pYVzcoJGL7uLCW3655+254R4iKKX1dzZ+xEd06qawUZlHhC 8KP/eYo2ydo9fs8ABOCsh/1SdL3W9Rakw2MvG3ns79A2EVJArz+H5ngLUtm32DC6 muaPKkluS+V3JP1rDsARUY7yMXTQPbX0hr1wYdenjfqwDSSdWY1SVuPU3VFw/A7F YABxzggCbl6EvTSXPU+3uDYVbOxwOvVglG/7K2aDn3i6EIXLma6oI4EZp1wzRtj/ YS5UyN2J4wnZrjwnXr8A =lxk3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStackemail@example.com http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev