On 10/30/2014 09:15 PM, Adam Lawson wrote: > I was thinking after reading all this; besides modifying the number of > required patches, perhaps we could try a blind election; candidate names > are removed so ballots have to be cast based on the merit of each > candidate's responses to the questions and/or ideas - which I think > effectively eliminates the possibility of partisan voting based name > recognition or based on the fact they are a well-known as PTL for a > specific project i.e. nothing to do with TC but their prominence within > the development hierarchy. > > Or something along those lines. If we aren't electing names, might as > well cast ballots that eliminates them form the equation. ; ) Might be > another 'when hell freezes over' suggestion but I thought I'd at least > throw it out there for discussion.
I actually hope *nobody* votes purely on a candidacy email. I would hate to see someone get elected who was just able to write a really nice email and does not otherwise participate regularly in the development community. I find someone's reputation based on the results they produce from ongoing involvement in the project even more important. -- Russell Bryant _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
