On 10/31/2014 08:29 AM, Russell Bryant wrote: > On 10/30/2014 09:15 PM, Adam Lawson wrote: >> I was thinking after reading all this; besides modifying the number of >> required patches, perhaps we could try a blind election; candidate names >> are removed so ballots have to be cast based on the merit of each >> candidate's responses to the questions and/or ideas - which I think >> effectively eliminates the possibility of partisan voting based name >> recognition or based on the fact they are a well-known as PTL for a >> specific project i.e. nothing to do with TC but their prominence within >> the development hierarchy. >> >> Or something along those lines. If we aren't electing names, might as >> well cast ballots that eliminates them form the equation. ; ) Might be >> another 'when hell freezes over' suggestion but I thought I'd at least >> throw it out there for discussion. > > I actually hope *nobody* votes purely on a candidacy email. I would > hate to see someone get elected who was just able to write a really nice > email and does not otherwise participate regularly in the development > community. I find someone's reputation based on the results they > produce from ongoing involvement in the project even more important.
+1 -Sean -- Sean Dague http://dague.net _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev