Tomasz we are not using ssl in our client so now we not gain anything from moving to 2.7 .
Best regards, – Kamil S. On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 8:32 AM, Bartłomiej Piotrowski < [email protected]> wrote: > On 01/13/2015 11:16 PM, Tomasz Napierala wrote: > >> >> On 13 Jan 2015, at 10:51, Przemyslaw Kaminski <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> For example >>> >>> https://www.python.org/download/releases/2.6.9/ >>> >>> "All official maintenance for Python 2.6, including security patches, >>> has ended." >>> >>> https://hg.python.org/cpython/raw-file/v2.7.9/Misc/NEWS >>> >>> Especially the SSL stuff is interesting >>> >>> http://bugs.python.org/issue22935 >>> >> >> This looks like final word here. We cannot provide software, that has no >> security support. >> >> Regards, >> >> > I can hardly see it as a justification for maintaining yet another package > on our own while Red Hat is supposed to provide backports of security fixes > to python 2.6 until 2020. > > I wanted to hear exact use cases of 2.7 features that allow us to > accomplish things easier than it is now with 2.6. As Doug already said, > clients and Oslo libraries will maintain compatibility with 2.6. So what is > the real gain? > > Regards, > Bartłomiej > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
