The previous policy is that we do a release "when requested" or when a critical bug fix merges. I don't see any critical fixes awaiting release, but I am not opposed to a release.
The reason I didn't do this yesterday is that Joe wanted some time to pin the stable requirements, which I believe he is still working on. Let's give him some time unless this is urgent. Michael On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 2:45 PM, melanie witt <[email protected]> wrote: > On Feb 6, 2015, at 8:17, Matt Riedemann <[email protected]> wrote: > >> We haven't done a release of python-novaclient in awhile (2.20.0 was >> released on 2014-9-20 before the Juno release). >> >> It looks like there are some important feature adds and bug fixes on master >> so we should do a release, specifically to pick up the change for keystone >> v3 support [1]. >> >> So can this be done now or should this wait until closer to the Kilo release >> (library releases are cheap so I don't see why we'd wait). > > Thanks for bringing this up -- there are indeed a lot of important features > and fixes on master. > > I agree we should do a release as soon as possible, and I don't think there's > any reason to wait until closer to Kilo. > > melanie (melwitt) > > > > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > -- Rackspace Australia __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
