On 2/9/2015 9:55 PM, Michael Still wrote:
The previous policy is that we do a release "when requested" or when a
critical bug fix merges. I don't see any critical fixes awaiting
release, but I am not opposed to a release.

The reason I didn't do this yesterday is that Joe wanted some time to
pin the stable requirements, which I believe he is still working on.
Let's give him some time unless this is urgent.

Michael

On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 2:45 PM, melanie witt <[email protected]> wrote:
On Feb 6, 2015, at 8:17, Matt Riedemann <[email protected]> wrote:

We haven't done a release of python-novaclient in awhile (2.20.0 was released 
on 2014-9-20 before the Juno release).

It looks like there are some important feature adds and bug fixes on master so 
we should do a release, specifically to pick up the change for keystone v3 
support [1].

So can this be done now or should this wait until closer to the Kilo release 
(library releases are cheap so I don't see why we'd wait).

Thanks for bringing this up -- there are indeed a lot of important features and 
fixes on master.

I agree we should do a release as soon as possible, and I don't think there's 
any reason to wait until closer to Kilo.

melanie (melwitt)





__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev





Yeah we need to hold off to cap requirements on stable first, which is currently blocked by stable being busted in other ways [1].

[1] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-February/056353.html

--

Thanks,

Matt Riedemann


__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to