Malini, all, My current opinion is -1 for FFE based on the concerns in the spec and implementation.
I'm more than happy to realign my stand after we have updated spec and a) it's agreed to be the approach as of now and b) we can evaluate how much work the implementation needs to meet with the revisited spec. If we end up to the unfortunate situation that this functionality does not merge in time for Liberty, I'm confident that this is one of the first things in Mitaka. I really don't think there is too much to go, we just might run out of time. Thanks for your patience and endless effort to get this done. Best, Erno > -----Original Message----- > From: Bhandaru, Malini K [mailto:malini.k.bhand...@intel.com] > Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2015 10:10 AM > To: Flavio Percoco; OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage > questions) > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Feature Freeze Exception proposal > > Flavio, first thing in the morning Kent will upload a new BP that addresses > the > comments. We would very much appreciate a +1 on the FFE. > > Regards > Malini > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Flavio Percoco [mailto:fla...@redhat.com] > Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2015 1:52 AM > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Feature Freeze Exception proposal > > On 02/09/15 22:11 -0400, Nikhil Komawar wrote: > >Hi, > > > >I wanted to propose 'Single disk image OVA import' [1] feature proposal > >for exception. This looks like a decently safe proposal that should be > >able to adjust in the extended time period of Liberty. It has been > >discussed at the Vancouver summit during a work session and the > >proposal has been trimmed down as per the suggestions then; has been > >overall accepted by those present during the discussions (barring a few > >changes needed on the spec itself). It being a addition to already > >existing import task, doesn't involve API change or change to any of > >the core Image functionality as of now. > > > >Please give your vote: +1 or -1 . > > > >[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/194868/ > > I'd like to see support for OVF being, finally, implemented in Glance. > Unfortunately, I think there are too many open questions in the spec right > now to make this FFE worthy. > > Could those questions be answered to before the EOW? > > With those questions answered, we'll be able to provide a more, realistic, > vote. > > Also, I'd like us to evaluate how mature the implementation[0] is and the > likelihood of it addressing the concerns/comments in time. > > For now, it's a -1 from me. > > Thanks all for working on this, this has been a long time requested format to > have in Glance. > Flavio > > [0] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/214810/ > > > -- > @flaper87 > Flavio Percoco > __________________________________________________________ > ________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev- > requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
