FYI, this was granted FFE. On 9/8/15 11:02 AM, Nikhil Komawar wrote: > Malini, > > Your note on the etherpad [1] went unnoticed as we had that sync on > Friday outside of our regular meeting and weekly meeting agenda etherpad > was not fit for discussion purposes. > > It would be nice if you all can update & comment on the spec, ref. the > note or have someone send a relative email here that explains the > redressal of the issues raised on the spec and during Friday sync [2]. > > [1] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/glance-team-meeting-agenda > [2] > http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-glance/%23openstack-glance.2015-09-04.log.html#t2015-09-04T14:29:47 > > On 9/5/15 4:40 PM, Bhandaru, Malini K wrote: >> Thank you Nikhil and Glance team on the FFE consideration. >> We are committed to making the revisions per suggestion and separately seek >> help from the Flavio, Sabari, and Harsh. >> Regards >> Malini, Kent, and Jakub >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Nikhil Komawar [mailto:nik.koma...@gmail.com] >> Sent: Friday, September 04, 2015 9:44 AM >> To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org >> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Feature Freeze Exception proposal >> >> Hi Malini et.al., >> >> We had a sync up earlier today on this topic and a few items were discussed >> including new comments on the spec and existing code proposal. >> You can find the logs of the conversation here [1]. >> >> There are 3 main outcomes of the discussion: >> 1. We hope to get a commitment on the feature (spec and the code) that the >> comments would be addressed and code would be ready by Sept 18th; after >> which the RC1 is planned to be cut [2]. Our hope is that the spec is merged >> way before and implementation to the very least is ready if not merged. The >> comments on the spec and merge proposal are currently implementation details >> specific so we were positive on this front. >> 2. The decision to grant FFE will be on Tuesday Sept 8th after the spec has >> newer patch sets with major concerns addressed. >> 3. We cannot commit to granting a backport to this feature so, we ask the >> implementors to consider using the plug-ability and modularity of the >> taskflow library. You may consult developers who have already worked on >> adopting this library in Glance (Flavio, Sabari and Harsh). Deployers can >> then use those scripts and put them back in their Liberty deployments even >> if it's not in the standard tarball. >> >> Please let me know if you have more questions. >> >> [1] >> http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-glance/%23openstack-glance.2015-09-04.log.html#t2015-09-04T14:29:47 >> [2] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Liberty_Release_Schedule >> >> On 9/3/15 1:13 PM, Bhandaru, Malini K wrote: >>> Thank you Nikhil and Brian! >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Nikhil Komawar [mailto:nik.koma...@gmail.com] >>> Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2015 9:42 AM >>> To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org >>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Feature Freeze Exception >>> proposal >>> >>> We agreed to hold off on granting it a FFE until tomorrow. >>> >>> There's a sync up meeting on this topic tomorrow, Friday Sept 4th at >>> 14:30 UTC ( #openstack-glance ). Please be there to voice your opinion and >>> cast your vote. >>> >>> On 9/3/15 9:15 AM, Brian Rosmaita wrote: >>>> I added an agenda item for this for today's Glance meeting: >>>> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/glance-team-meeting-agenda >>>> >>>> I'd prefer to hold my vote until after the meeting. >>>> >>>> cheers, >>>> brian >>>> >>>> >>>> On 9/3/15, 6:14 AM, "Kuvaja, Erno" <kuv...@hp.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Malini, all, >>>>> >>>>> My current opinion is -1 for FFE based on the concerns in the spec >>>>> and implementation. >>>>> >>>>> I'm more than happy to realign my stand after we have updated spec >>>>> and a) it's agreed to be the approach as of now and b) we can >>>>> evaluate how much work the implementation needs to meet with the >>>>> revisited spec. >>>>> >>>>> If we end up to the unfortunate situation that this functionality >>>>> does not merge in time for Liberty, I'm confident that this is one >>>>> of the first things in Mitaka. I really don't think there is too >>>>> much to go, we just might run out of time. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for your patience and endless effort to get this done. >>>>> >>>>> Best, >>>>> Erno >>>>> >>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>> From: Bhandaru, Malini K [mailto:malini.k.bhand...@intel.com] >>>>>> Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2015 10:10 AM >>>>>> To: Flavio Percoco; OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for >>>>>> usage >>>>>> questions) >>>>>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Feature Freeze Exception >>>>>> proposal >>>>>> >>>>>> Flavio, first thing in the morning Kent will upload a new BP that >>>>>> addresses the comments. We would very much appreciate a +1 on the >>>>>> FFE. >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards >>>>>> Malini >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>> From: Flavio Percoco [mailto:fla...@redhat.com] >>>>>> Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2015 1:52 AM >>>>>> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >>>>>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Feature Freeze Exception >>>>>> proposal >>>>>> >>>>>> On 02/09/15 22:11 -0400, Nikhil Komawar wrote: >>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I wanted to propose 'Single disk image OVA import' [1] feature >>>>>>> proposal for exception. This looks like a decently safe proposal >>>>>>> that should be able to adjust in the extended time period of >>>>>>> Liberty. It has been discussed at the Vancouver summit during a >>>>>>> work session and the proposal has been trimmed down as per the >>>>>>> suggestions then; has been overall accepted by those present >>>>>>> during the discussions (barring a few changes needed on the spec >>>>>>> itself). >>>>>>> It being a addition to already existing import task, doesn't >>>>>>> involve API change or change to any of the core Image functionality as >>>>>>> of now. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Please give your vote: +1 or -1 . >>>>>>> >>>>>>> [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/194868/ >>>>>> I'd like to see support for OVF being, finally, implemented in Glance. >>>>>> Unfortunately, I think there are too many open questions in the >>>>>> spec right now to make this FFE worthy. >>>>>> >>>>>> Could those questions be answered to before the EOW? >>>>>> >>>>>> With those questions answered, we'll be able to provide a more, >>>>>> realistic, vote. >>>>>> >>>>>> Also, I'd like us to evaluate how mature the implementation[0] is >>>>>> and the likelihood of it addressing the concerns/comments in time. >>>>>> >>>>>> For now, it's a -1 from me. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks all for working on this, this has been a long time requested >>>>>> format to have in Glance. >>>>>> Flavio >>>>>> >>>>>> [0] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/214810/ >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> @flaper87 >>>>>> Flavio Percoco >>>>>> __________________________________________________________ >>>>>> ________________ >>>>>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >>>>>> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev- >>>>>> requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe >>>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >>>>> ____________________________________________________________________ >>>>> _ _____ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >>>>> Unsubscribe: >>>>> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe >>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >>>> _____________________________________________________________________ >>>> _ ____ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >>>> Unsubscribe: >>>> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe >>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
-- Thanks, Nikhil __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
