Graham,

Agree. Hence the Tooz as the abstraction layer. Folks are welcome to
write new drivers or fix existing drivers for Tooz where needed.

-- Dims

On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Hayes, Graham <graham.ha...@hpe.com> wrote:
> On 04/11/15 20:04, Ed Leafe wrote:
>> On Nov 3, 2015, at 6:45 AM, Davanum Srinivas <dava...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Here's a Devstack review for zookeeper in support of this initiative:
>>>
>>> https://review.openstack.org/241040
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Dims
>>
>> I thought that the operators at that session made it very clear that they 
>> would *not* run any Java applications, and that if OpenStack required a Java 
>> app to run, they would no longer use it.
>>
>> I like the idea of using Zookeeper as the DLM, but I don't think it should 
>> be set up as a default, even for devstack, given the vehement opposition 
>> expressed.
>>
>>
>> -- Ed Leafe
>>
>
> I got the impression that there was *some* operators that wouldn't run
> java.
>
> I do not see an issue with having ZooKeeper as the default, as long as
> there is an alternate solution that also works for the operators that do
> not want to use it.
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev



-- 
Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims

__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to