On Oct 10, 2016 4:35 PM, "Tony Breeds" <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 08:42:48AM +0200, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > > > I think it would also make sense to *release* on the boundary of the switch; > > so that it’s clear which phase a release followed. > > I agree, I don't really have a mechanism for do that though. I didn't state > this but my plan was to reach out the PTLs that have the stable:follows-policy > tag and ask them to release. I suppose I could go one step further and > propose the change in openstack/releases but that seems a little like over > reach to me.
I think it's a good idea for us to do it. I'm not sure you need more things to do in a day, Tony. That said, I've had a hard time getting candidates for back ports for Glance so it may not be a very interesting release (a good thing obviously).
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
