On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 08:34:12AM +1100, Tony Breeds wrote: > On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 08:42:48AM +0200, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > > > I think it would also make sense to *release* on the boundary of the switch; > > so that it’s clear which phase a release followed. > > I agree, I don't really have a mechanism for do that though. I didn't state > this but my plan was to reach out the PTLs that have the stable:follows-policy > tag and ask them to release. I suppose I could go one step further and > propose the change in openstack/releases but that seems a little like over > reach to me. > > What do PTLs / stable CPLs think?
That makes sense to me. I tried to do that for the last go around as a final official release for the stable branch. > > BTW: I see you've done this for neutron :) Thanks! > > Yours Tony. > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
