On 11 October 2016 at 08:34, Tony Breeds <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 08:42:48AM +0200, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
> > I think it would also make sense to *release* on the boundary of the
> switch;
> > so that it’s clear which phase a release followed.
>
> I agree, I don't really have a mechanism for do that though. I didn't
> state
> this but my plan was to reach out the PTLs that have the
> stable:follows-policy
> tag and ask them to release. I suppose I could go one step further and
> propose the change in openstack/releases but that seems a little like over
> reach to me.
>
> What do PTLs / stable CPLs think?
>
As long as "boundary" is a generous number of days (a week?) and not a
single point in time, I think this is sensible.
Richard
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
