On 10/10/2016 11:34 PM, Tony Breeds wrote:
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 08:42:48AM +0200, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
I think it would also make sense to *release* on the boundary of the switch;
so that it’s clear which phase a release followed.
I agree, I don't really have a mechanism for do that though. I didn't state
this but my plan was to reach out the PTLs that have the stable:follows-policy
tag and ask them to release. I suppose I could go one step further and
propose the change in openstack/releases but that seems a little like over
reach to me.
What do PTLs / stable CPLs think?
+1 to the idea.
I see that many Ironic projects only have global requirements updates since the
last release. Should we request a release as well?
BTW: I see you've done this for neutron :) Thanks!
Yours Tony.
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
