Druid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> Your point is not valid. People did complain about having a gtk app in kde, >> which is why it was replaced > > The point is valid. The reason they created a gtk version of yast was > because they wouldnt accept using a qt app in gnome. By the same > logic, there shouldnt be the gtk applet in kde from the beginning. > That if they would care about that, which they didnt. Only after it > was already there, they thought of making a qt version, but as an > enhancement, that wasnt considered a blocker or a big deal (it was > considered by the users, it seems).
Developing another frontend takes time - and if you have the choice
between fixing the stack or adding extra functionality, you will
concentrate on fixing the stack. That's at least what we did.
I don't think it makes sense insulting others here and I ask you to stop
these, it does not bring us anywhere,
Andreas
--
Andreas Jaeger, Director Platform/openSUSE, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
pgpi8DZWI62vy.pgp
Description: PGP signature
