On Sunday 09 September 2007 16:19:33 Druid wrote: > > Your point is not valid. People did complain about having a gtk app in > > kde, which is why it was replaced > > The point is valid. The reason they created a gtk version of yast was > because they wouldnt accept using a qt app in gnome.
Actually no. It was a google "summer of code" project. Not a blocker bug that had to be fixed > By the same > logic, there shouldnt be the gtk applet in kde from the beginning. > That if they would care about that, which they didnt. Only after it > was already there, they thought of making a qt version, but as an > enhancement, that wasnt considered a blocker or a big deal (it was > considered by the users, it seems). I don't quite see how you reason. There was a qt application (yast2) in gnome. People wanted a gtk/gnome version, so someone wrote it and now it gets used. Similarly, there was a gtk application in kde (the updater applet). People wanted a kde version so someone wrote it and now it gets used. I see absolutely no difference at all (except perhaps that yast2/qt was used for far longer in gnome before someone bothered writing a gnome/gtk frontend for it) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
