On Wednesday 12 December 2007 04:28:03 am Stefan Hundhammer wrote: > On Wednesday 12 December 2007 03:13, Rajko M. wrote: > > See my earlier comment. > > See my earlier two comments... ;-) > > > This doesn't sort packages as wanted. > > > I found package with newer version in the middle of the list of packages > > that have no newer version. > > This is why you should sort by version, not by status. See previous posts.
Problem is word status. You use it as: installed or not (checkmark - any color), marked for update (fancy Z), deletion (trash can) , taboo (wrong direction sign), locked (lock), while I was using status as updateable or not (avail. version). With little help of colors that stretch over whole row, for me status column was different (blue checkmark, is not the same as red or black), and I was confused why sort by the most left column doesn't work (as I expect). Than came your post that forced thinking ;-) Robert: as you can see, seeing colors is not always advantage ;-) -- Regards, Rajko -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
