Clayton wrote:
Anyone else seeing Beagle really kill performance? I have disabled
it and my machine finally is perky, but every now and then, I find it
in memory again. How do I arange it to chew up less memory and CPU or
kill it once and for all?
Usually this indicates you have a problematic file (usually its broken
or corrupt) that causes the index helper to go into a loop while
indexing.
See http://beagle-project.org/Troubleshooting_CPU for instructions on
how to report such a bug.
A bit late to the discussion here... I also have to kill Beagle every
time I do an install. I tried it again with the 10.3 install I did
this weekend. It sucked up so much of my system resources that I
could barely do anything else... this is on a *clean* default install
(not an upgrade) on an AMD Athlon 64 X2 3800+ with 2Gb of RAM, a /home
with basically no data, but about 1.2TB of data on other mount points.
My CPU.. both cores.. were running about 99%. RAM was full, and swap
was filling up as well. The whole computer was grinding to a halt.
When I finally managed top open a terminal and run top... Beagle was
there consuming 100% of everything it could. I left Beagle run for a
while... an afternoon... and it never changed. Kept my CPU nice and
toasty warm though. In the end I sopped the daemon, and removed every
trace of Beagle I could find. The result... the computer is back to
normal. The 10.3 install is noticeably faster than the previous 10.2
install (also without Beagle).... and I'm happy.. .although a bit
puzzled how it is that anyone finds Beagle useable.
This is typical behavior, and the developers have known about
it for a long time, because there are written complaints about
it all over the place.
And the devs haven't done shit about it.
which is why I joked about beating them with baseball
bats until they do fix it. Because apparently, extreme
disgust with the horrible performance characteristic of
their creation doesn't seem to motivate them one bit.
As a contrast, I can install the Google Desktop indexer (on the dual
core system), and I never notice it is there. It indexes roughly the
same scope of data (I think). It never runs so that I am aware it's
indexing. My other apps carry on with no noticeable impact on
performance.
I see a few people here saying Beagle runs fine for them with no
noticeable impact on performance... how? I've struggled with Beagle
since it first appeared on the openSUSE scene. I have seen it's
appalling impact on performance over several installs on several
different hardware configurations. Not once have I seen it "work" in
any measure that could be considered good.
Personally, I think they're either lying, or not paying
attention.
I will continue to try it out with each new install I do, but... i
don't hold out a lot of hope. I've kind of lumped it in with zmd...
another app that is on my search and destroy list for a new install.
Once those two apps are gone from a default install the computer works
great with openSUSE.
Yep!
Why these system-resource hogs which offer functionality
which is .. peripheral at best... are installed by default
is utterly insane.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
