On Monday 14 January 2008 05:35:30 am Clayton wrote: > > > I see a few people here saying Beagle runs fine for them with no > > > noticeable impact on performance... how? > > > > It seems that you monitor Beagle in a first time after installation. > > Though there is pops up note telling that computer will be slower in a > > first few minutes. Later on you shouldn't notice indexing. > > I let Beagle run longer than 24h on the dual core system. System > response remained horrible. A friend installed 10.2 and then updated > everything including Beagle... it ran for a couple of weeks with > Beagle killing his system performance before he called and asked what > was wrong. So, I am not talking 30 seconds of annoyance here... this > is days of uptime on fast machines... and weeks on slower machines. > > > version is 'beagle-0.2.18-30' which by any interpretation of version > > string is early development. On the other hand, how many people will ever > > attempt to test software with so low version (except Linux users)? > > Test by choice is a good thing... lots of us here install from Factory > just to see what works. I have a VM I do that in all the time. Lots > of things break and I have to roll back to a previous snapshot (which > is why I like to use a VM instead of a native system) > > Setting it as part of the default install makes the new users test it > as well. That isn't giving the new user a lot of choice. > > > > with basically no data, but about 1.2TB of data on other mount points. > > > >Which you could tell beagle not to index. That's a lot of data. > > True, but a significant portion of it is video. Mostly very large > files eating up a lot of that diskspace.... not millions of small text > files that need to be indexed. Indexing 2 or 3 hundred binary video > files should not take that long. >
Clayton, here is the link to couple of bugs for 10.3 with word 'beagle' in description please look at it. Add your own if none does not describe your experience. https://bugzilla.novell.com/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&short_desc=beagle&long_desc_type=fulltext&long_desc=&classification=openSUSE&product=openSUSE+10.3&bug_file_loc_type=allwordssubstr&bug_file_loc=&status_whiteboard_type=allwordssubstr&status_whiteboard=&keywords_type=anywords&keywords=&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=NEEDINFO&bug_status=REOPENED&emailassigned_to1=1&emailtype1=substring&email1=&emailassigned_to2=1&emailreporter2=1&emailqa_contact2=1&emailcc2=1&emailtype2=substring&email2=&bugidtype=include&bug_id=&votes=&chfieldfrom=&chfieldto=Now&chfieldvalue=&cmdtype=doit&order=Reuse+same+sort+as+last+time&field0-0-0=noop&type0-0-0=noop&value0-0-0= Endless complains here have no much sense. It makes complains look like a lobbing, that is trying to discredit Beagel in order to advance some other technology. I have few machines and I can't confirm 99% CPU usage 100% of time on any of them. On this one it is comming up every few seconds (5-10s) and uses 10-30% of CPU. I have no time right now to retreive numbers for other machines, but it is just not that intrusive to make machine run slow. I use no special tweaking, it is just stock 10.3 installation. -- Regards, Rajko -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
