On Mon, 2008-01-14 at 06:03 -0500, Aaron Kulkis wrote: > Rajko M. wrote: > > On Monday 14 January 2008 02:22:18 am Clayton wrote: > > > >> I see a few people here saying Beagle runs fine for them with no > >> noticeable impact on performance... how? > > > > It seems that you monitor Beagle in a first time after installation. > > Though there is pops up note telling that computer will be slower in a > > first > > few minutes. Later on you shouldn't notice indexing. > > > > Though that it should be optional as you suggested in another post as the > > version is 'beagle-0.2.18-30' which by any interparetation of version > > string > > is early development. On the other hand, how many people will ever attempt > > to > > test software with so low version (except Linux users)? > > Which brings back the question... > > Why in the hell is Beagle part of the default installation? > > it's 0.2 level, and it runs like complete crap.
As we know, in the open source community, version numbers can mean different things to different projects. Beagle is NOT a project meant for testing, it is a project for use in user's desktops. -- Kevin "Yo" Dupuy | Public Email: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Happy New Year from Yo.media! -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
