On Monday 14 January 2008 05:03:11 am Aaron Kulkis wrote: > Rajko M. wrote: > > On Monday 14 January 2008 02:22:18 am Clayton wrote: > >> I see a few people here saying Beagle runs fine for them with no > >> noticeable impact on performance... how? > > > > It seems that you monitor Beagle in a first time after installation. > > Though there is pops up note telling that computer will be slower in a > > first few minutes. Later on you shouldn't notice indexing. > > > > Though that it should be optional as you suggested in another post as the > > version is 'beagle-0.2.18-30' which by any interpretation of version > > string is early development. On the other hand, how many people will ever > > attempt to test software with so low version (except Linux users)? > > Which brings back the question... > > Why in the hell is Beagle part of the default installation? > > it's 0.2 level, and it runs like complete crap.
The problem is that I don't see any bug report mentioned here, and right now I can't help. -- Regards, Rajko -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
