On Wednesday 17 October 2007 23:22, Tim Brown wrote:
> So we have two choices here?
>
> DSA -> OVAL -> NASL
> DSA -> NASL
>
> I would vote to use OVAL as an intermediatry format, because it
> immediately puts us within reach of anyone that uses OVAL, whereas
> obviously a direct DSA to NASL converter only works for the
> Debian(-inspired) community.
I also opt for OVAL as intermediate format.
> Jan, any chance of seeing the oval2nasl code?
well, I am not the author. In general, we learned that
only oval2nasl is not enough. You need a (continously
extended) library that actually do the "tst:" as referenced
in OVAL.
It is important that dsa2oval uses a consistent scheme for
"tst:".
I'll see what I can do about the chances ;-)
Best
Jan
--
Dr. Jan-Oliver Wagner Intevation GmbH
Amtsgericht Osnabrück, HR B 18998 http://www.intevation.de/
Geschäftsführer: Frank Koormann, Bernhard Reiter, Dr. Jan-Oliver Wagner
_______________________________________________
Openvas-devel mailing list
Openvas-devel@wald.intevation.org
http://lists.wald.intevation.org/mailman/listinfo/openvas-devel
