It seems, patches are often lost "somewhere in mailing list archives"
I still have no idea why this way of distributing patches is prefferable over native github PRs 2 мая 2016 г. 12:55 пользователь "Steffan Karger" <stef...@karger.me> написал: On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 9:44 AM, Samuli Seppänen <sam...@openvpn.net> wrote: > >> 1) add travis-ci support (there are few tests in "t" and we can run >> cppcheck) > > I assume cppcheck produces the same results regardless of the > OS/distribution it is running on. If this is the case, then we should > add cppcheck tests to Travis-CI. Yes, I think this makes sense. As a first step, someone could review my patch from December to enable travis-ci on our repo: https://sourceforge.net/p/openvpn/mailman/message/34709650/ -Steffan
