sf.net mailing list can go away as well. I do not see why relying on sf.net is any better than relying on github.com
2016-05-02 14:47 GMT+05:00 Gert Doering <g...@greenie.muc.de>: > Hi, > > On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 12:02:37PM +0300, Samuli Seppänen wrote: > > At minimum we should clearly state why we prefer email patches > > over GitHub PRs. Then revisit the arguments every now and then, and > > adapt as necessary. > > "Our workflow relies on public availability of patch and ACK, referenced > by Message-ID:" > > Github could go away any day, and then any documentation based on github > PRs > is just gone. > > Right now, if github (or sf.net, for that matter) goes away, we just push > elsewhere, or set up our own official git repo server. > > (I wonder if we should start running our own mailing list archive, and > point *there* for the commit URLs - gmane is down again, which is quite > a bit inconvenient for me) > > gert > -- > USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW! > // > www.muc.de/~gert/ > Gert Doering - Munich, Germany > g...@greenie.muc.de > fax: +49-89-35655025 > g...@net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de >
