Hi > 2.3.2 -> 2.3.4 has no significant security impact (if I remember correctly), > it's just the provided *windows* binaries have, because they bundle OpenSSL > and that one was vulnerable. So from a security PoV, it's ok to stick to > 2.3.2, as any version change could bring in new bugs...
Thanks Gert. Hi Samuli As you are the community manager and the person who compiles and creates binaries for Windows and Debian platforms, could you confirm that, from a security point of view, there is no difference in using Linux versions 2.3.2 and 2.3.4? Thanks for your help. Lisa ----------------------------------------------------- Mail.be, WebMail and Virtual Office http://www.mail.be ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Infragistics Professional Build stunning WinForms apps today! Reboot your WinForms applications with our WinForms controls. Build a bridge from your legacy apps to the future. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=153845071&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Openvpn-users mailing list Openvpn-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-users
