ho hum ----- Original Message ----- From: "Selva Nair" <selva.n...@gmail.com> To: "Erich Titl" <erich.t...@think.ch> Cc: <openvpn-users@lists.sourceforge.net> Sent: Friday, October 23, 2015 6:29 PM Subject: Re: [Openvpn-users] Strange OpenVPN and Konica Minolta spoolerconflict
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 8:06 AM, Erich Titl <erich.t...@think.ch> wrote: > >> Hi JJK >> >> Am 23.10.2015 um 13:48 schrieb Jan Just Keijser: >> > Hi, >> > >> ... >> >> > >> > As for the strange subnet: I've seen many companies that abuse public >> > IP >> > space for their own internal networks. Provided that you get your >> > routing+natting right, this does not necessarily have to ben an issue. >> > I've seen nowhere that it's KM that uses this subnet, it's the client's >> > *IT department* that uses it. >> >> If you have been assigned this subnet then it is your problem, if not >> then you may hijack part of your internal traffic that wants to go to >> that subnet :-( >> >> ;; QUESTION SECTION: >> ;0.28.60.192.in-addr.arpa. IN PTR >> >> ;; AUTHORITY SECTION: >> 60.192.in-addr.arpa. 600 IN SOA eadns1.unisys.com. >> hostmaster.unisys.com. 2009052801 28800 1800 2592000 3600 >> >> It is just one thing to avoid. The postal service would frown on you >> having the same house number as a house on the other end of the street >> even if your house is empty :-( >> > > Why think the client is not Unisys or someone authorized by Unisys to use > that IP space? If I post the current LAN subnet I'm own you will skewer me > until I tell you I work for the assignee > No OpenVPN configs. No OpenVPN logs. A clearly mis-configured LAN .. leading *me* to the conclusion that other things have been done badly. and now, what *looks to me* like the start of a flame war ... RFC1918 was created for good reasons .. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Openvpn-users mailing list Openvpn-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-users
