Hi Am 23.10.2015 um 09:27 schrieb David Raison: > > > On 23/10/15 02:17, Erich Titl wrote: >> Why do you think so? >> 192.60.28.0 belongs to Unisys > > Yes, I realize that their choice of a subnet is odd,
No, plain _wrong_ unless they are Unisys. and mentioned as > much, but how would this influence the openvpn and printer spooler issue > at hand? They've been using that subnet for years now and the problem > only occurs since and when they're using openvpn. Would need to know more about the traffic to judge, but using a foreign public net as an internal net is definitely a _nono_ > > The only traffic routed through the vpn tunnel would be the one going to > the SQLServer. Which is on which subnet? You will have to inspect routing, then trace the affected traffic. > > I may very well be unawares of something. How would using this subnet > have an impact on openvpn and the spooling process? (If it is in fact > related to the spooler.) Which we just hearsay. cheers ET ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Openvpn-users mailing list Openvpn-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-users
