On 23/10/15 11:41, Erich Titl wrote: >> > Yes, I realize that their choice of a subnet is odd, > No, plain _wrong_ unless they are Unisys. Granted. I can always suggest they change that, but not sure they will actually be willing to change this. But maybe they should and we might see that it miraculously solves the problem…
>> > much, but how would this influence the openvpn and printer spooler issue >> > at hand? They've been using that subnet for years now and the problem >> > only occurs since and when they're using openvpn. > Would need to know more about the traffic to judge, but using a foreign > public net as an internal net is definitely a _nono_ > >> > >> > The only traffic routed through the vpn tunnel would be the one going to >> > the SQLServer. > Which is on which subnet? You will have to inspect routing, then trace > the affected traffic. The SQLServer is on 10.0.1.253, with the VPN gateway being 10.0.1.1 and the client having 10.0.1.5x. I know we don't have much to go on right now, so I think I'll get back to you once I have more information. Best regards, David -- TenTwentyFour S.Ã r.l. W: www.tentwentyfour.lu T: +352 20 211 1024 F: +352 20 211 1023 9 av. des Hauts-Fourneaux 4362 Esch-sur-Alzette
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Openvpn-users mailing list Openvpn-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-users
