On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 1:03 PM, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi! > > I've talked with Pete Muir at the JSFDays about the JSR-299 spec a lot. > > Since he has taken over the lead from Gavin,
he is the IMPL lead, at JBoss. And now the JBoss rep. on JSF 2.0 > it should be possible to change an EG member also. And also to add another > person. Yes, that's correct. That was the reason why I brought this up > > The Spec for 1.0 is almost finished, there are a few things which should be > addressed but there is not enough time to get it rdy for EE6! So this is > basically a situation where we have to get rid of all showstoppers but we > shouldn't add additional functionality at this point! > > I think the common ground of the JSR-299 Spec is solid enough and fairly > extendable. We have to implement what's in the Spec but are completely free > to add additional functionality! I also talked with Pete about a few features > they will add, and they now also have SE support which is not mentioned in > the Spec. So I think it will not be a problem to have new features added > which are compatible in RI and OWB _without_ having them written down in the > WebBeans-1.0 Spec but in a later one! > sounds interesting. What features you were discussing? Can you bring it up here ? -Matthias > One possible thing that still may come is that some functionality (like > eventing or interceptors, cannot remember which) may be removed from WebBeans > and moved over to EJB or another spec. > > So one who does this Job really needs to know OWB insideout _plus_ a good > amount of understanding of the whole EE business > > I don't think you are deep enough into OWB yet, but personally would highly > appreciate to see you as a committer on OWB in the future :) > > LieGrue, > strub > > --- James Carman <[email protected]> schrieb am Do, 16.4.2009: > >> Von: James Carman <[email protected]> >> Betreff: Re: JSR 299 / WebBeans -> Expert Group >> An: [email protected] >> Datum: Donnerstag, 16. April 2009, 12:35 >> On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 4:35 AM, >> Matthias Wessendorf <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > I want to step back from the Expert Group. Question is >> now: >> > Does one of you want to be on that EG ? This community >> would >> > make most sense to have an active OWB committer being >> part >> > of the spec/EG. >> >> I would be interested in joining, but I am not an OWB >> committer. I'm >> very interested in making sure the spec stays agnostic when >> it comes >> to the environment in which it runs. The >> specification should make it >> easy to use in Wicket, or Tapestry, or just plain ole JSP >> applications. >> > > > > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
