not sure if cross postings are really cool :-) I do prefer a bookmarkable link and just pointing to it...
-M On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 10:53 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi; > > > Does the 299 specification indicate that interceptors and decorators should > not be called for dependent scoped beans? > > Currently we do not implement Interceptor/Decorator on @Dependent scoped > beans in OWB because we do all interceptor/decorator stuff using proxy and > @Dependent scoped beans do not require client proxy. > > Does anyone has a good use case/example when dependent scoped beans are > useful or necessary? > > Thanks; > > --Gurkan > > > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
