FYI.
----- Forwarded Message ---- From: Gavin King <[email protected]> To: Gurkan Erdogdu <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected] Sent: Tue, October 27, 2009 8:49:53 PM Subject: Re: [weld-dev] Using Interceptor/Decorator On Dependent Scoped Beans Yes, this is required and useful. However, interceptors/decorators are not really intended to be applied via the "client proxy" that the spec talks about. In fact, the spec is written to allow the interception to be implemented without any separate proxy object at all (using a subclass). On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 1:53 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi; > > > Does the 299 specification indicate that interceptors and decorators should > not be called for dependent scoped beans? > > Currently we do not implement Interceptor/Decorator on @Dependent scoped > beans in OWB because we do all interceptor/decorator stuff using proxy and > @Dependent scoped beans do not require client proxy. > > Does anyone has a good use case/example when dependent scoped beans are > useful or necessary? > > Thanks; > > --Gurkan > > > > > _______________________________________________ > weld-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev > -- Gavin King [email protected] http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Gavin http://hibernate.org http://seamframework.org
