According to the intro in Chapter 8. Decorators: "Decorators may be associated with any managed bean that is not itself an interceptor or decorator or with any EJB session bean."
Dependent-scoped beans are managed beans, so ergo, they must allow decorators. I can't provide a use case off the top of my head (just not something my mind is currently chewing on). -Dan On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 1:53 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi; > > > Does the 299 specification indicate that interceptors and decorators should > not be called for dependent scoped beans? > > Currently we do not implement Interceptor/Decorator on @Dependent scoped > beans in OWB because we do all interceptor/decorator stuff using proxy and > @Dependent scoped beans do not require client proxy. > > Does anyone has a good use case/example when dependent scoped beans are > useful or necessary? > > Thanks; > > --Gurkan > > > > > _______________________________________________ > weld-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev > -- Dan Allen Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action Registered Linux User #231597 http://mojavelinux.com http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen
