----- Forwarded Message ----
From: Marius Bogoevici <[email protected]>
To: Dan Allen <[email protected]>
Cc: Gurkan Erdogdu <[email protected]>;
[email protected]; [email protected]
Sent: Tue, October 27, 2009 8:50:39 PM
Subject: Re: [weld-dev] Using Interceptor/Decorator On Dependent Scoped Beans
In Weld, we do apply decorators and interceptors on all managed beans,
including the ones which are @Dependent.
Marius
On Tue, 2009-10-27 at 14:03 -0400, Dan Allen wrote:
> According to the intro in Chapter 8. Decorators:
>
>> "Decorators may be associated with any managed bean that is not itself an
>> interceptor or decorator or with any EJB session bean."
>
>> Dependent-scoped beans are managed beans, so ergo, they must allow
>> decorators.
>
>> I can't provide a use case off the top of my head (just not something my
>> mind is currently chewing on).
>
>> -Dan
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 1:53 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi;
>>
>>
>>>> Does the 299 specification indicate that interceptors and
>>>> decorators should
>>>> not be called for dependent scoped beans?
>>
>>>> Currently we do not implement Interceptor/Decorator on @Dependent
>>>> scoped beans in OWB because we do all interceptor/decorator stuff using
>>>> proxy and @Dependent scoped beans do not require client proxy.
>>
>>>> Does anyone has a good use case/example when dependent scoped beans
>>>> are useful or necessary?
>>
>>>> Thanks;
>>
>>>> --Gurkan
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> weld-dev mailing list
>>[email protected]
>>https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev
>
>
>> --
>> Dan Allen
>> Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
>> Registered Linux User #231597
>
>http://mojavelinux.com
>http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
>http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen
>_______________________________________________
>weld-dev mailing list
>[email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev
