Hi,

   While I find the build process basically opaque, I think
anything that can be done to make it better and ckearer is well worth it.

   For me some simple examples and some clearer explanation
of the intent of the various makes would be a big help.

 i.e.- 

       1. rebuild all except toolset = ???  ( Saves LOTS of time )

       2. clear world and rebuild as if just downloaded to a new
directory.
       3. erase full directory tree, (try to) download all files and
rebuild
       4. save all downloaded files (somewhere) , erase full directory
tree and rebuild


  FWIW - I usually do 4. manually but would rather do 1. if it really
worked? Maybe it already does? 

   warm regards,
   wiz


   

On Tue, 27 Jul 2010, Jim Henderson wrote:

> On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 16:52:28 +0100, Matthias Buecher / Germany wrote:
> 
> > Just read this thread today and want to mention, that if you run into
> > build problems you should issue a "make distclean" (not dirclean) to get
> > rid of all old stuff and extra packages (create patches of your manual
> > changes first, so you can later re-apply them).
> 
> That's good to know - I didn't notice that distclean was an option, and 
> have been just doing a make clean && make world - so will change my 
> workflow to do distclean instead.
> 
> When I run into build issues, I normally wait at least one additional 
> release before reporting an issue (and take some time to look through the 
> svn logs to see what might've caused a problem - I usually try to 
> pinpoint the cause of the problem so I can make a useful report).  In 
> this case, I'd had some troubles for about a day and nothing in the logs 
> was making it clear to me why I was seeing a problem (indeed, the only 
> updates seemed to be for a different platform than what I build for).
> 
> Appreciate all the tips and everyone's help.  I'm still fairly new to 
> building this code - but I also like testing bleeding-edge code.  :-)
> 
> Jim
> -- 
>  Jim Henderson
>  Please keep on-topic replies on the list so everyone benefits
> 
> _______________________________________________
> openwrt-devel mailing list
> openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
> https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
> 

_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Reply via email to