On 09/06/12 15:43, Tim Fletcher wrote: > If I understood the process right you need to tftp it to 0x800000 and > then go from 0x800200 Again, loading it to 0x800000 cannot work with that patch. The address to tftp-load the u-boot bin (or kwb) depends on what is defined as TEXT_BASE, either see mv-common.h, sometimes it's overwritten in config.mk or the .h definitions file of the board in include/configs/. As both doesn't seem to be the case for the iconnect, you should try loading it to 0x600000 (and then go 0x600000 for the .bin or go 0x600200 for the .kwb) _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
- Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH v2][RFC] uboot-kirkwood: upgrade... Tim Fletcher
- Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH v2][RFC] uboot-kirkwood: up... Daniel Golle
- Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH v2][RFC] uboot-kirkwood: up... Luka Perkov
- Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH v2][RFC] uboot-kirkwood... Tim Fletcher
- Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH v2][RFC] uboot-kirk... Tim Fletcher
- Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH v2][RFC] uboot-... Luka Perkov
- Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH v2][RFC] u... Tim Fletcher
- Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH v2][RF... Luka Perkov
- Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH v2... Tim Fletcher
- Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH v2][RF... Daniel Golle
- Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH v2... Tim Fletcher
- Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH v2][RFC] uboot-kirkwood: up... Martin Mueller
- Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH v2][RFC] uboot-kirkwood... Daniel Golle
- Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH v2][RFC] uboot-kirk... Martin Mueller
- Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH v2][RFC] uboot-... Luka Perkov
- Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH v2][RFC] uboot-kirk... Luka Perkov
- Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH v2][RFC] uboot-... Martin Mueller
- Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH v2][RFC] u... Luka Perkov
- Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH v2][RF... Martin Mueller
- Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH v2... Luka Perkov
