On 09/08/2020 12:44, Bjørn Mork wrote:
Mauro Mozzarelli <ma...@ezplanet.org> writes:
On 09/08/2020 03:35, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
I believe OpenWrt should not even *consider* placing its umbrella
organization(s) -- which are based on the U.S. -- in legal risk
without at least contacting them first and getting their approval.
Has anyone asked SPI about it yet?
Who/What are these "umbrella" organizations? What is their
relationship with OpenWrt?
This is answered by the FAQ:
https://openwrt.org/faq/general
And what is the "legal risk"?
I guess that's the question you should ask the SPI.
This is not a technical or a political discussion. It's about not
putting your friends at unnecessary risk, even if they happen to live
under some regime you don't like or respect.
Bjørn
Although I respect other's opinions and rules, I do not think it is
right to limit everyone's freedom, just to appease some.
If there is a minority who is unable to use parts of this software, we
can make it easy for that minority to be able to strip those software
components (or they can propose and implement changes that achieve that
themselves), but in no way limit or prevent everyone from making use of it.
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
