thanks for your suggestion Ben. The only one in that list which seems to support bandwidth restrictions in attitude ajustment is coovachilli.
I have seen that coovachilli has an option "-noradallow" to authorize sessions when RADIUS is not available and an "splash mode" to just show an splash website to the clients. That is right what I want. I don´t want to create user accounts because this is a public hot-spot. I will try if I can get those two options working together. Do you know if coovachilli allows to restrict which ports can use the clients? I mean, I just want to allow my client to access port 80 and 443, is that possible? An I suppose that clients in the public network will be in a private subnet isolated from my lan, isn´t it? thanks. Pablo. 2013/4/24 Ben West <[email protected]> > The coovachilli service will do bandwidth throttling just fine (at least > tested OK in Attitude Adjustment), and on a per-client basis. However, is > not stand-alone like nodogsplash, since it does expect a RADIUS server > somewhere in the cloud to respond to authentication requests. > > Besides, this wiki page lists other tools: > http://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/howto/wireless.hotspot > > On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 2:30 PM, Pablo Escobar <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I am currently running backfire 10.03.1rc5 in my main router (an alix >> board). >> >> I have a captive portal using the nodogsplash package to share >> 3mbps/200kbps with my neighbours using the nodogsplash capabilities to >> limit the bandwidth usage, but the bandwidth limitation feature depend on >> the package iptables-mod-imq which it is no longer available in attitude >> ajustment. I think it has been replaced by IFB. >> >> As I have some spare time now I was planning to upgrade my router to >> attitude ajustment just to take a look at the new release but as the >> package iptables-mod-imq is no longer available I suppose I can´t limit the >> bandwidth usage in the captive portal if I use nodogsplash. >> >> does anyone knows if there is any way to configure a captive portal in >> aptitude ajustment with download/upload bandwidth limitation alternative to >> nodogsplash? or any way to get iptables-mod-imq working in attitude >> ajustment so I can continue using nodogsplash? or any way to make >> nodogplash to use IFB? >> >> thanks in advance for any suggestion. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> openwrt-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-users >> >> > > > -- > Ben West > http://gowasabi.net > [email protected] > 314-246-9434 > > _______________________________________________ > openwrt-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-users > >
_______________________________________________ openwrt-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-users
