Hi Jim, Is possible with wondershapper to set different bandwidth limitations for different interfaces? could you post your wondershapper configuration?
thanks in advance. Pablo. 2013/4/25 Jim Henderson <[email protected]> > On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 23:38:14 +0200, Pablo Escobar wrote: > > > The only one in that list which seems to support bandwidth restrictions > > in attitude ajustment is coovachilli. > > > > [...] > > > Do you know if coovachilli allows to restrict which ports can use the > > clients? I mean, I just want to allow my client to access port 80 and > > 443, > > is that possible? An I suppose that clients in the public network will > > be in a private subnet isolated from my lan, isn´t it? > > FWIW, I'm running nodogsplash on Barrier Breaker and am using a > combination of tools to accomplish this - wondershaper to do bandwidth > limiting, and just standard port traffic rules to block everything on the > guest wifi network and then rules to open ports 80 and 443 on that > network specifically. Works like a charm. > > Yes, the public network typically is set up with a subnet that's isolated > from the private lan. > > Jim > > -- > Jim Henderson > Please keep on-topic replies on the list so everyone benefits > > _______________________________________________ > openwrt-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-users >
_______________________________________________ openwrt-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-users
