> IMNSHO opm-core is way too large. Ultimately opm-parser should use opm-core 
> in the sense of low level core routines, but the scenario where opm-parser 
> uses opm-core is quite far away from the current incarnation of opm-core.

Agreed, the parser seems to stand on its own feet, I don't see how it can 
benefit from existing functionality in core. On the contrary, it is slated to 
replace the parsing functionality already found in core. Again, please 
enlighten me is there is something I am missing here.

> I realize my weight of say in these matters is quite limited, but in my 
> opinion it would be healthy for OPM as a whole to refactor the module 
> organization?

>From Arne Morten's comments that sounds like a good idea, but I hope we can 
>postpone that to after the Norne milestone. I also hope refactoring can be 
>done one piece at the time, so that we can keep the code base functional 
>during the process. Natural evolution rather than revolution.

Cheers,
Alf

-------------------------------------------------------------------
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you
_______________________________________________
Opm mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.opm-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opm

Reply via email to