Niclas ... I have no clue why he isn't shown ... according to openhub.net
he still is [1]

Pavel, one could also always have 15 Microservices taking care of those 15
domains.

regards, Achim

[1] - https://www.openhub.net/p/pax-web/users

2016-10-03 6:54 GMT+02:00 Pavel Kastornyy <pavelkastor...@gmail.com>:

> Hi Marc
>
> You are absolutely right - it is possible to use frontend server
> and use pax-web as backend server. But in this case pax-web
> in any serious production use can be used only as backend +
> if you have 15 domains you will manage 15 ports.
>
> Best regards,
>
>
> On 02.10.2016 21:46, Marc Schlegel wrote:
>
>> Here are my two cents
>>
>> Regarding the whiteboard-extender, I was actually thinking of moving this
>> into the webcontainer, because due to the whiteboard-dto spec those two
>> are
>> closely related anyways. My idea was to deprecate the (upcoming)
>> WhiteboardManager-service right away in order to merge those two modules
>> in
>> a 7.0 release. So that might solve one pain-point.
>>
>> But another question is: do we need to rewrite everything in order to get
>> a
>> feature which might no be needed? Without knowing the business-case behind
>> registering multiple contexts with the same name in different
>> virtual-hosts, I still think that there are much cheaper alternatives:
>> everything today moves away from heavy-installations (AppServers) in favor
>> of dedicated containers. With OSGi and Pax-Web you can easily spawn
>> multiple VMs, and have some proxy/webserver in front which manages the
>> site/domain to look like one.
>>
>> regards
>> Marc
>>
>>
>> Am Sonntag, 2. Oktober 2016 15:39:45 UTC+2 schrieb iJava:
>>
>>> Hi Achim
>>>
>>> Could you say (from the top of your head) approximatively how many hours
>>> may these changes need - 100/1000/5000/10000?
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>>
>>> воскресенье, 2 октября 2016 г., 15:40:23 UTC+3 пользователь Achim
>>> Nierbeck
>>> написал:
>>>
>>>> Sounds like a good and interesting idea ...
>>>> Right now only from the top of my head:
>>>> The Pax-Web Runtime and therefore the different Implementations aren't
>>>> made for this right now. So this would need a complete rewrite of how
>>>> we're
>>>> handling it. Another point would be how would web and white-board
>>>> extender
>>>> work with it. We could think about wiring those two closer to the core.
>>>> Never the less an application deploying servlets will always need to add
>>>> the virtual host environment, working with defaults could take care of
>>>> that.
>>>>
>>>> We could consider to start this with a complete rewrite of Pax-Web and
>>>> therefore aim for a 7.0.
>>>>   BUT ... I fear I won't have enough time to takle this. Considering the
>>>> amount of time I spent in the past and about what it would take to have
>>>> all
>>>> the functionalities of Pax-Web re-written, and especially with my
>>>> $dayJob +
>>>> Family.
>>>>
>>>> regards, Achim
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2016-10-02 5:35 GMT+02:00 Niclas Hedhman <nic...@hedhman.org>:
>>>>
>>>> Honestly, if this is to be fixed, I think Pax Web should support Managed
>>>>> Service Factory, and instantiate separate virtual host services
>>>>> according
>>>>> to a provided configuration. That configuration should contain which
>>>>> WAB(s)
>>>>> goes into that virtual host, together with any other virtual host
>>>>> configuration.
>>>>>
>>>>> To me, that seems to be the right solution forward, maintains OSGi
>>>>> compatibility, doesn't introduce new config args on WABs and doesn't
>>>>> treat
>>>>> "one domain" different than another.
>>>>>
>>>>> I think the tricky bit is to make the default case and the MSF
>>>>> instantiations play nicely with each other, but that is an design
>>>>> implementation detail at this stage.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers
>>>>> Niclas
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 4:49 PM, iJava <pavelka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I analyzed situation again and I am sure I am right. How I explain this
>>>>>> - if *only*
>>>>>> web-contextpath is used then all war bundles (wabs) are inside one
>>>>>> domain.
>>>>>> Obvious if you need more then one domains (virtualhosts) this
>>>>>> limitation is
>>>>>> unpleasant. So I am sure that when bundle is deployed it must have
>>>>>> *two*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> settings:
>>>>>>    Layer one - virtualhosts (plural)
>>>>>>    Layer two - web-contextpath.
>>>>>> In this case the deployer has all the advantages. He can create N
>>>>>> sites
>>>>>> And inside every virtualhost he can make N contexts if he needs.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am sure that this functionality must be developed. Pax-web is great
>>>>>> product
>>>>>> and with such functionality it will have all main functionality of a
>>>>>> good web server.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I would be glad to hear others opinion about such New Feature.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> пятница, 30 сентября 2016 г., 18:14:33 UTC+3 пользователь iJava
>>>>>> написал:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ok Achim.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I understood the situation. You know the architecture of pax-web
>>>>>>> well.
>>>>>>> Could you say - how difficult
>>>>>>> it can be to make some extender (plugin etc) to link wabs not to
>>>>>>> web-contextpath but to virtualhosts
>>>>>>> and to make them all work with one port like it is in usual web
>>>>>>> servers (for example apache).
>>>>>>> Please, note I don't care about specification - I care about normal
>>>>>>> work.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> пятница, 30 сентября 2016 г., 18:06:23 UTC+3 пользователь Achim
>>>>>>> Nierbeck написал:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I never said Pax-Web is a complete replacement for GlassFish,
>>>>>>>> it's a WebContainer for OSGi environments, which fulfills the OSGi
>>>>>>>> spec.
>>>>>>>> It uses Jetty, Undertow or Tomcat to do so. AND it gives you most of
>>>>>>>> the benefits of those underlying servers in the
>>>>>>>> same way. If you're not satisfied because you expect something
>>>>>>>> different. I'm sorry to hear
>>>>>>>> but nothing we can do about.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> regards, Achim
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 2016-09-30 17:04 GMT+02:00 Achim Nierbeck <bcan...@googlemail.com>:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Well, in that case try to use GlassFish again.
>>>>>>>>> GlassFish uses a complete different strategy.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regards, Achim
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 2016-09-30 17:02 GMT+02:00 iJava <pavelka...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Something is wrong here. I worked with glassfish. Everything starts
>>>>>>>>>> with glassfish domain.
>>>>>>>>>> In one domain you usually have one http connector and one https
>>>>>>>>>> connector. After that in
>>>>>>>>>> one domain you can have multiple virtual hosts. When you deploy
>>>>>>>>>> osgi bundle you
>>>>>>>>>> in manifest have Web-ContextPath and VirtualServers. So you can
>>>>>>>>>> have N sites
>>>>>>>>>> (example.com, boo.org, blablabla.net) with WebContextPath / and
>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>> is not necessary
>>>>>>>>>>   to create new connectors for new ports.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I know it well, because I remember it took me some time to make it
>>>>>>>>>> work.
>>>>>>>>>> And I was very glad because it is easy to work with one port then
>>>>>>>>>> with N.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Now you suggest me to go back and again work with N ports. I am
>>>>>>>>>> shocked and killed.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> пятница, 30 сентября 2016 г., 17:49:30 UTC+3 пользователь Achim
>>>>>>>>>> Nierbeck написал:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> yes, you can only have one Web-ContextPath per WAB. "/" is
>>>>>>>>>>> especially tricky since you can also have HttpService servlets
>>>>>>>>>>> listening on
>>>>>>>>>>> that one.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> regards, Achim
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 2016-09-30 16:46 GMT+02:00 iJava <pavelka...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Achim
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you for the links, I wil study them now. So, do I
>>>>>>>>>>>> understand it right -
>>>>>>>>>>>> accroding to specs I can have only one bundle with
>>>>>>>>>>>> web-contextpath / for one port ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> пятница, 30 сентября 2016 г., 17:37:55 UTC+3 пользователь Achim
>>>>>>>>>>>> Nierbeck написал:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's in the spec ...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Now, if you want to run virtual hosts, take a look at the links
>>>>>>>>>>>>> below.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> regards, Achim
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] -
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.web/blob/master/pax-w
>>>>>>>>>>>>> eb-itest/pax-web-itest-container/pax-web-itest-container-
>>>>>>>>>>>>> jetty/src/test/java/org/ops4j/pax/web/itest/jetty/JettyConfi
>>>>>>>>>>>>> gurationExtendedIntegrationTest.java
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] -
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.web/blob/master/pax-w
>>>>>>>>>>>>> eb-itest/pax-web-itest-container/pax-web-itest-container-
>>>>>>>>>>>>> jetty/src/test/java/org/ops4j/pax/web/itest/jetty/JettyConfi
>>>>>>>>>>>>> gurationExtendedTwoIntegrationTest.java
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3] -
>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/2013/01/bind-certain-web-applic
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ations-to-specific-httpconnectors/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2016-09-30 16:23 GMT+02:00 Pavel Kastornyy <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> pavelka...@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Achim, I understand you, but why? If the domains are different
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> why must I change web-contextpath? For example, lets suppose
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have five different sites on one osgi and for every site I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> separate wab (which is logical) and every wab has only one
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> context
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - /. It is normal situation - take a look at any web server.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 30.09.2016 17:19, 'Achim Nierbeck' via OPS4J wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The Manifest entry Web-ContextPath is the one in charge of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> where the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> application resides in.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So in that case you need to make sure of different
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Web-ContextPaths.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> regards, Achim
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2016-09-30 16:09 GMT+02:00 iJava <pavelka...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Achim,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, you are right. The same web-contextpath in both
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bundles:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But it seems to be a bug because in bundle A I have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jetty-web.xml
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <Configure
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> class="org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletContextHandler">
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       <Set name="virtualHosts">
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>           <Array type="java.lang.String">
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>             <Item>example.com</Item>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>             <Item>www.example.com</Item>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>           </Array>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       </Set>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </Configure>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and in bundle B I have jetty-web.xml
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <Configure
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> class="org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletContextHandler">
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       <Set name="virtualHosts">
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>           <Array type="java.lang.String">
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>             <Item>foo.example.com</Item>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>             <Item>www.foo.example.com</Item>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>           </Array>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       </Set>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </Configure>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> пятница, 30 сентября 2016 г., 16:54:24 UTC+3 пользователь
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Achim Nierbeck
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this seems to be a rather strange bug. Do both of the war
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> maybe have the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> same web-contextpath?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> regards, Achim
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2016-09-30 14:09 GMT+02:00 iJava <pavelka...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It may seem to be funny question but I have the following
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> situation. I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have two war bundles A and B.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> When I start and install only bundle A - it works ok. When
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I start and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> install only bundle B it works ok.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> When I try to install both of them always only the first
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> works. The
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> servlet in the second bundle is not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> instantiated. I tried to add
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <load-on-startup>0</load-on-startup> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> servlet config
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in web.xml but it didn't help.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any ideas? Does anyone try to deploy more then one war
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bundle on the same
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> osgi framework with pax-web 6.0?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - op...@googlegroups.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Google
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Groups "OPS4J" group.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from it, send
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an email to ops4j+un...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/op
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tout.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache Member
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /paxweb/Pax+Web/>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Committer
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> & Project Lead
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Co-Author of Apache Karaf Cookbook <http://bit.ly/1ps9rkS>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Software Architect / Project Manager / Scrum Master
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - op...@googlegroups.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Google Groups
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "OPS4J" group.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it, send an
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> email to ops4j+un...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - op...@googlegroups.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --- You received this message because you are subscribed to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Google Groups "OPS4J" group.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it, send an email to ops4j+un...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache Member
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
>>>>>>>>>>>>> OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Committer & Project Lead
>>>>>>>>>>>>> blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Co-Author of Apache Karaf Cookbook <http://bit.ly/1ps9rkS>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Software Architect / Project Manager / Scrum Master
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - op...@googlegroups.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the
>>>>>>>>>>>> Google Groups "OPS4J" group.
>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from
>>>>>>>>>>>> it,
>>>>>>>>>>>> send an email to ops4j+un...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Apache Member
>>>>>>>>>>> Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
>>>>>>>>>>> OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/>
>>>>>>>>>>> Committer & Project Lead
>>>>>>>>>>> blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
>>>>>>>>>>> Co-Author of Apache Karaf Cookbook <http://bit.ly/1ps9rkS>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Software Architect / Project Manager / Scrum Master
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> ------------------
>>>>>>>>>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - op...@googlegroups.com
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>>>>>> Groups "OPS4J" group.
>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>>>>>>>> send an email to ops4j+un...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Apache Member
>>>>>>>>> Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
>>>>>>>>> OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/>
>>>>>>>>> Committer & Project Lead
>>>>>>>>> blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
>>>>>>>>> Co-Author of Apache Karaf Cookbook <http://bit.ly/1ps9rkS>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Software Architect / Project Manager / Scrum Master
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Apache Member
>>>>>>>> Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
>>>>>>>> OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/>
>>>>>>>> Committer & Project Lead
>>>>>>>> blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
>>>>>>>> Co-Author of Apache Karaf Cookbook <http://bit.ly/1ps9rkS>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Software Architect / Project Manager / Scrum Master
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>> ------------------
>>>>>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - op...@googlegroups.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>> Groups "OPS4J" group.
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>>>> an email to ops4j+un...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
>>>>> http://zest.apache.org - New Energy for Java
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> --
>>>>> ------------------
>>>>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - op...@googlegroups.com
>>>>>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>> Groups "OPS4J" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>>> an email to ops4j+un...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> Apache Member
>>>> Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
>>>> OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> Committer
>>>> & Project Lead
>>>> blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
>>>> Co-Author of Apache Karaf Cookbook <http://bit.ly/1ps9rkS>
>>>>
>>>> Software Architect / Project Manager / Scrum Master
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
> --
> --
> ------------------
> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com
>
> --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "OPS4J" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>



-- 

Apache Member
Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> Committer &
Project Lead
blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
Co-Author of Apache Karaf Cookbook <http://bit.ly/1ps9rkS>

Software Architect / Project Manager / Scrum Master

-- 
-- 
------------------
OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"OPS4J" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to