Hi, I would like to suggest that it is not advisable to put the virtual host name into the bundle. That is IMNSHO at odds with the normal flexibility available. I think that one way of doing it is through configuration of Pax Web, such as an optional map of "Bundle-SymbolicName" to "Virtual Host Name". There might be other...
Niclas On Sun, Oct 9, 2016 at 11:03 AM, iJava <pavelkastor...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Achim, > > I had some free time (it is 5 am now :) ) to take a look at pax-web > sources. > What I suggest after short analysis is: > 1) The solution must be absolute backward compatible with pax-web 6.0. (I > need this feature > and I can't wait ? time for version 7.0.0) > 2) In deployed bundles there will be an optional(!) Virtual-Hosts setting > in manifest of war bundle. > I think that even it there is any virtual-host settings separate from > bundles in the future, > it is bundle that must say to which virtual host it wants to belong to. > 3) We add virtualHosts collection to > org.ops4j.pax.web.service.spi.model.ServerModel > + > fix all match* methods. Besides we fix match* in > JettyServerHandlerCollection > 4) it is necessary to allow war bundles with the same context if the have > virtual-hosts setting. > I haven't looked yet where it can be done. > 5) The suggested solution is a "first attempt" to see how it will be like > and will not > require much time (which is the problem #1). If someone has time in future > he\she can > always make the solution better. > > What will you say? > > P.S. I considered only for jetty as I wrote above. > > > понедельник, 3 октября 2016 г., 21:43:15 UTC+3 пользователь Achim Nierbeck > написал: >> >> Niclas ... I have no clue why he isn't shown ... according to openhub.net >> he still is [1] >> >> Pavel, one could also always have 15 Microservices taking care of those >> 15 domains. >> >> regards, Achim >> >> [1] - https://www.openhub.net/p/pax-web/users >> >> 2016-10-03 6:54 GMT+02:00 Pavel Kastornyy <pavelka...@gmail.com>: >> >>> Hi Marc >>> >>> You are absolutely right - it is possible to use frontend server >>> and use pax-web as backend server. But in this case pax-web >>> in any serious production use can be used only as backend + >>> if you have 15 domains you will manage 15 ports. >>> >>> Best regards, >>> >>> >>> On 02.10.2016 21:46, Marc Schlegel wrote: >>> >>>> Here are my two cents >>>> >>>> Regarding the whiteboard-extender, I was actually thinking of moving >>>> this >>>> into the webcontainer, because due to the whiteboard-dto spec those two >>>> are >>>> closely related anyways. My idea was to deprecate the (upcoming) >>>> WhiteboardManager-service right away in order to merge those two >>>> modules in >>>> a 7.0 release. So that might solve one pain-point. >>>> >>>> But another question is: do we need to rewrite everything in order to >>>> get a >>>> feature which might no be needed? Without knowing the business-case >>>> behind >>>> registering multiple contexts with the same name in different >>>> virtual-hosts, I still think that there are much cheaper alternatives: >>>> everything today moves away from heavy-installations (AppServers) in >>>> favor >>>> of dedicated containers. With OSGi and Pax-Web you can easily spawn >>>> multiple VMs, and have some proxy/webserver in front which manages the >>>> site/domain to look like one. >>>> >>>> regards >>>> Marc >>>> >>>> >>>> Am Sonntag, 2. Oktober 2016 15:39:45 UTC+2 schrieb iJava: >>>> >>>>> Hi Achim >>>>> >>>>> Could you say (from the top of your head) approximatively how many >>>>> hours >>>>> may these changes need - 100/1000/5000/10000? >>>>> >>>>> Best regards, >>>>> >>>>> воскресенье, 2 октября 2016 г., 15:40:23 UTC+3 пользователь Achim >>>>> Nierbeck >>>>> написал: >>>>> >>>>>> Sounds like a good and interesting idea ... >>>>>> Right now only from the top of my head: >>>>>> The Pax-Web Runtime and therefore the different Implementations aren't >>>>>> made for this right now. So this would need a complete rewrite of how >>>>>> we're >>>>>> handling it. Another point would be how would web and white-board >>>>>> extender >>>>>> work with it. We could think about wiring those two closer to the >>>>>> core. >>>>>> Never the less an application deploying servlets will always need to >>>>>> add >>>>>> the virtual host environment, working with defaults could take care >>>>>> of that. >>>>>> >>>>>> We could consider to start this with a complete rewrite of Pax-Web and >>>>>> therefore aim for a 7.0. >>>>>> BUT ... I fear I won't have enough time to takle this. Considering >>>>>> the >>>>>> amount of time I spent in the past and about what it would take to >>>>>> have all >>>>>> the functionalities of Pax-Web re-written, and especially with my >>>>>> $dayJob + >>>>>> Family. >>>>>> >>>>>> regards, Achim >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> 2016-10-02 5:35 GMT+02:00 Niclas Hedhman <nic...@hedhman.org>: >>>>>> >>>>>> Honestly, if this is to be fixed, I think Pax Web should support >>>>>>> Managed >>>>>>> Service Factory, and instantiate separate virtual host services >>>>>>> according >>>>>>> to a provided configuration. That configuration should contain which >>>>>>> WAB(s) >>>>>>> goes into that virtual host, together with any other virtual host >>>>>>> configuration. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> To me, that seems to be the right solution forward, maintains OSGi >>>>>>> compatibility, doesn't introduce new config args on WABs and doesn't >>>>>>> treat >>>>>>> "one domain" different than another. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I think the tricky bit is to make the default case and the MSF >>>>>>> instantiations play nicely with each other, but that is an design >>>>>>> implementation detail at this stage. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cheers >>>>>>> Niclas >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 4:49 PM, iJava <pavelka...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I analyzed situation again and I am sure I am right. How I explain >>>>>>>> this >>>>>>>> - if *only* >>>>>>>> web-contextpath is used then all war bundles (wabs) are inside one >>>>>>>> domain. >>>>>>>> Obvious if you need more then one domains (virtualhosts) this >>>>>>>> limitation is >>>>>>>> unpleasant. So I am sure that when bundle is deployed it must have >>>>>>>> *two* >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> settings: >>>>>>>> Layer one - virtualhosts (plural) >>>>>>>> Layer two - web-contextpath. >>>>>>>> In this case the deployer has all the advantages. He can create N >>>>>>>> sites >>>>>>>> And inside every virtualhost he can make N contexts if he needs. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I am sure that this functionality must be developed. Pax-web is >>>>>>>> great >>>>>>>> product >>>>>>>> and with such functionality it will have all main functionality of a >>>>>>>> good web server. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I would be glad to hear others opinion about such New Feature. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> пятница, 30 сентября 2016 г., 18:14:33 UTC+3 пользователь iJava >>>>>>>> написал: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Ok Achim. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I understood the situation. You know the architecture of pax-web >>>>>>>>> well. >>>>>>>>> Could you say - how difficult >>>>>>>>> it can be to make some extender (plugin etc) to link wabs not to >>>>>>>>> web-contextpath but to virtualhosts >>>>>>>>> and to make them all work with one port like it is in usual web >>>>>>>>> servers (for example apache). >>>>>>>>> Please, note I don't care about specification - I care about normal >>>>>>>>> work. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> пятница, 30 сентября 2016 г., 18:06:23 UTC+3 пользователь Achim >>>>>>>>> Nierbeck написал: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I never said Pax-Web is a complete replacement for GlassFish, >>>>>>>>>> it's a WebContainer for OSGi environments, which fulfills the OSGi >>>>>>>>>> spec. >>>>>>>>>> It uses Jetty, Undertow or Tomcat to do so. AND it gives you most >>>>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>>>> the benefits of those underlying servers in the >>>>>>>>>> same way. If you're not satisfied because you expect something >>>>>>>>>> different. I'm sorry to hear >>>>>>>>>> but nothing we can do about. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> regards, Achim >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> 2016-09-30 17:04 GMT+02:00 Achim Nierbeck <bcan...@googlemail.com >>>>>>>>>> >: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Well, in that case try to use GlassFish again. >>>>>>>>>>> GlassFish uses a complete different strategy. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Regards, Achim >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> 2016-09-30 17:02 GMT+02:00 iJava <pavelka...@gmail.com>: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Something is wrong here. I worked with glassfish. Everything >>>>>>>>>>>> starts >>>>>>>>>>>> with glassfish domain. >>>>>>>>>>>> In one domain you usually have one http connector and one https >>>>>>>>>>>> connector. After that in >>>>>>>>>>>> one domain you can have multiple virtual hosts. When you deploy >>>>>>>>>>>> osgi bundle you >>>>>>>>>>>> in manifest have Web-ContextPath and VirtualServers. So you can >>>>>>>>>>>> have N sites >>>>>>>>>>>> (example.com, boo.org, blablabla.net) with WebContextPath / >>>>>>>>>>>> and it >>>>>>>>>>>> is not necessary >>>>>>>>>>>> to create new connectors for new ports. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I know it well, because I remember it took me some time to make >>>>>>>>>>>> it >>>>>>>>>>>> work. >>>>>>>>>>>> And I was very glad because it is easy to work with one port >>>>>>>>>>>> then >>>>>>>>>>>> with N. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Now you suggest me to go back and again work with N ports. I am >>>>>>>>>>>> shocked and killed. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> пятница, 30 сентября 2016 г., 17:49:30 UTC+3 пользователь Achim >>>>>>>>>>>> Nierbeck написал: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> yes, you can only have one Web-ContextPath per WAB. "/" is >>>>>>>>>>>>> especially tricky since you can also have HttpService servlets >>>>>>>>>>>>> listening on >>>>>>>>>>>>> that one. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> regards, Achim >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 2016-09-30 16:46 GMT+02:00 iJava <pavelka...@gmail.com>: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Achim >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you for the links, I wil study them now. So, do I >>>>>>>>>>>>>> understand it right - >>>>>>>>>>>>>> accroding to specs I can have only one bundle with >>>>>>>>>>>>>> web-contextpath / for one port ? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> пятница, 30 сентября 2016 г., 17:37:55 UTC+3 пользователь >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Achim >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nierbeck написал: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's in the spec ... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Now, if you want to run virtual hosts, take a look at the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> links >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> below. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> regards, Achim >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] - >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.web/blob/master/pax-w >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> eb-itest/pax-web-itest-container/pax-web-itest-container- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jetty/src/test/java/org/ops4j/pax/web/itest/jetty/JettyConfi >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gurationExtendedIntegrationTest.java >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] - >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.web/blob/master/pax-w >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> eb-itest/pax-web-itest-container/pax-web-itest-container- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jetty/src/test/java/org/ops4j/pax/web/itest/jetty/JettyConfi >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gurationExtendedTwoIntegrationTest.java >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3] - >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/2013/01/bind-certain-web-applic >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ations-to-specific-httpconnectors/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2016-09-30 16:23 GMT+02:00 Pavel Kastornyy < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pavelka...@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> : >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Achim, I understand you, but why? If the domains are >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> different >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> why must I change web-contextpath? For example, lets suppose >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have five different sites on one osgi and for every site I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> separate wab (which is logical) and every wab has only one >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> context >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - /. It is normal situation - take a look at any web server. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 30.09.2016 17:19, 'Achim Nierbeck' via OPS4J wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The Manifest entry Web-ContextPath is the one in charge of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> where the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> application resides in. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So in that case you need to make sure of different >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Web-ContextPaths. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> regards, Achim >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2016-09-30 16:09 GMT+02:00 iJava <pavelka...@gmail.com>: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Achim, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, you are right. The same web-contextpath in both >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bundles: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> / >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But it seems to be a bug because in bundle A I have >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jetty-web.xml >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <Configure >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> class="org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletContextHandler"> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <Set name="virtualHosts"> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <Array type="java.lang.String"> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <Item>example.com</Item> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <Item>www.example.com</Item> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </Array> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </Set> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </Configure> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and in bundle B I have jetty-web.xml >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <Configure >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> class="org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletContextHandler"> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <Set name="virtualHosts"> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <Array type="java.lang.String"> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <Item>foo.example.com</Item> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <Item>www.foo.example.com</Item> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </Array> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </Set> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </Configure> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> пятница, 30 сентября 2016 г., 16:54:24 UTC+3 пользователь >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Achim Nierbeck >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this seems to be a rather strange bug. Do both of the war >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> maybe have the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> same web-contextpath? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> regards, Achim >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2016-09-30 14:09 GMT+02:00 iJava <pavelka...@gmail.com>: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It may seem to be funny question but I have the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> following >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> situation. I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have two war bundles A and B. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> When I start and install only bundle A - it works ok. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> When >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I start and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> install only bundle B it works ok. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> When I try to install both of them always only the first >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> works. The >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> servlet in the second bundle is not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> instantiated. I tried to add >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <load-on-startup>0</load-on-startup> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> servlet config >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in web.xml but it didn't help. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any ideas? Does anyone try to deploy more then one war >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bundle on the same >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> osgi framework with pax-web 6.0? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - op...@googlegroups.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Google >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Groups "OPS4J" group. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from it, send >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an email to ops4j+un...@googlegroups.com. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/op >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tout. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache Member >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /paxweb/Pax+Web/> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Committer >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> & Project Lead >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Co-Author of Apache Karaf Cookbook < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://bit.ly/1ps9rkS> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Software Architect / Project Manager / Scrum Master >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - op...@googlegroups.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Google Groups >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "OPS4J" group. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it, send an >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> email to ops4j+un...@googlegroups.com. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/op >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tout. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - op...@googlegroups.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --- You received this message because you are subscribed to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Google Groups "OPS4J" group. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it, send an email to ops4j+un...@googlegroups.com. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache Member >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Committer & Project Lead >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Co-Author of Apache Karaf Cookbook <http://bit.ly/1ps9rkS> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Software Architect / Project Manager / Scrum Master >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - op...@googlegroups.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Google Groups "OPS4J" group. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from >>>>>>>>>>>>>> it, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> send an email to ops4j+un...@googlegroups.com. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache Member >>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC >>>>>>>>>>>>> OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Committer & Project Lead >>>>>>>>>>>>> blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Co-Author of Apache Karaf Cookbook <http://bit.ly/1ps9rkS> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Software Architect / Project Manager / Scrum Master >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------ >>>>>>>>>>>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - op...@googlegroups.com >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the >>>>>>>>>>>> Google >>>>>>>>>>>> Groups "OPS4J" group. >>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from >>>>>>>>>>>> it, >>>>>>>>>>>> send an email to ops4j+un...@googlegroups.com. >>>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Apache Member >>>>>>>>>>> Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC >>>>>>>>>>> OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> >>>>>>>>>>> Committer & Project Lead >>>>>>>>>>> blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/> >>>>>>>>>>> Co-Author of Apache Karaf Cookbook <http://bit.ly/1ps9rkS> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Software Architect / Project Manager / Scrum Master >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Apache Member >>>>>>>>>> Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC >>>>>>>>>> OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> >>>>>>>>>> Committer & Project Lead >>>>>>>>>> blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/> >>>>>>>>>> Co-Author of Apache Karaf Cookbook <http://bit.ly/1ps9rkS> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Software Architect / Project Manager / Scrum Master >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> ------------------ >>>>>>>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - op...@googlegroups.com >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>>>> Groups "OPS4J" group. >>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >>>>>>>> send >>>>>>>> an email to ops4j+un...@googlegroups.com. >>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer >>>>>>> http://zest.apache.org - New Energy for Java >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> ------------------ >>>>>>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - op...@googlegroups.com >>>>>>> >>>>>>> --- >>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>>> Groups "OPS4J" group. >>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >>>>>>> send >>>>>>> an email to ops4j+un...@googlegroups.com. >>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> >>>>>> Apache Member >>>>>> Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC >>>>>> OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> >>>>>> Committer >>>>>> & Project Lead >>>>>> blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/> >>>>>> Co-Author of Apache Karaf Cookbook <http://bit.ly/1ps9rkS> >>>>>> >>>>>> Software Architect / Project Manager / Scrum Master >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>> -- >>> -- >>> ------------------ >>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - op...@googlegroups.com >>> >>> --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "OPS4J" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to ops4j+un...@googlegroups.com. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Apache Member >> Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC >> OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> Committer >> & Project Lead >> blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/> >> Co-Author of Apache Karaf Cookbook <http://bit.ly/1ps9rkS> >> >> Software Architect / Project Manager / Scrum Master >> >> -- > -- > ------------------ > OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com > > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "OPS4J" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer http://zest.apache.org - New Energy for Java -- -- ------------------ OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OPS4J" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
